
This "core curriculum" as its always been taught just so happens to have little perceived relevance to the life and experiences of students for whom the achievement gap is widest. In Minnesota the high school graduation rate for African Americans is 44%. For white students, it's 82%. Hello! Let's connect some dots here. It shouldn’t really come as a shock that the “core curriculum” generally approaches subjects from a white/Euro-centric viewpoint, and although there are clearly lots of factors involved in graduation rates I think that the presence (or lack thereof) of culturally relevant materials is important to consider.
If a picture is worth a thousand words, just think this:

vs. this:
People are not manufactured goods, and education can’t be approached from a factory perspective. Which brings me back to the emerging theme in my understanding of textbook content processes--that in focusing on the inclusion or exclusion of this word or that opinion, we are missing the bigger picture. There's no way we're going to see it if we continue to devote entire state school boards (like Texas) to blatantly injecting ideologically derived information into our nations textbooks.
No comments:
Post a Comment